교체의 정의와 교체의 해석 그리고 기저형

Title
교체의 정의와 교체의 해석 그리고 기저형
Other Titles
A Definition and Explanation of Alternation, and Underlying form
Author(s)
신승용
Keywords
alternation; rule; derived environment; synchronicity; diachronicity; underlying form; 교체; 규칙; 도출 환경; 공시성; 통시성; 기저형
Issue Date
201412
Publisher
한말연구학회
Citation
한말연구, no.35, pp.77 - 100
Abstract
There are predictable alternations, and are also unpredictable alternations. The rule that formulates unpredictable alternation isn't predictable, also isn't proper, yet we cannot say that the rule isn't rule if according to definition of rule. Because a rule is defined, whatever it is, as anything that formulates alternation. That rule is of course just non-proper on the view of veridity of rule. It is merely a problem of interpretation that a relation of two different surface forms [x] and [y] are alternation or the former and latter form of change. Regardless of if The phenomenon applied in [x] and [y] is interpreted in alternation or change, it is obvious fact that some phonological phenomenon had been applied between [x] and [y]. Some people severely have restricted synchronic alternation only to conjugation and declension. But if it does so, we cannot suppose synchronic alternation into word. A word can have one more than allomorph. And there isn't any evidence that a phonological phenomena appeared into word is diachronic one. Underlying form is just a existence interpreted. So we have to decide whether any alternation is synchronic one or diachronic one according to property of phenomenon itself.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/YU.REPOSITORY/30121
ISSN
1229-4500
Appears in Collections:
사범대학 > 국어교육과 > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE