지역 어메니티 촉진을 위한 마을만들기 운영사례 비교연구

Title
지역 어메니티 촉진을 위한 마을만들기 운영사례 비교연구
Other Titles
A comparative case study of neighbourhood makingfor promoting a local amenity
Author(s)
김근호이영창[이영창]
Keywords
Amenity; Neighbourhood Making; Residents’ Participation
Issue Date
201306
Publisher
한국농촌계획학회
Citation
농촌계획, v.19, no.2, pp.129 - 138
Abstract
The aim of the research was to analyze programs, outcomes, promotion process, and operation methods of neighbourhood making to provide basic information for progressive improvement directions in the future. Buk-gu in Gwanju city, samdeok-dong in Daegu city and dongpirang in Tongyeong city were selected for a comparative analysis. The main bodies of neighbourhood making for promoting a local amenity were analysed for this research. The results indicated that a voluntary and continuous participation of residents was expected in the case of neighbourhood making led by the residents. However, a steady budget support from the outside was necessary for the continuous management and improvement of neighbourhood organization. For this, a voluntary agreement was required through the consultative group and committee formation. The member of civil organization has a limitation in the ability to develop and maintain continuos activities in the case of neighbourhood making led by a civil organization. This research found that operation methods including the constant checking, the search for new ideas through assessment of the resident’s participation, local festivals for a community formation and real satisfactions of residents’ desires were needed in the neighbourhood making led by a civil organization. A participation rate in neighbourhood making was low in the case of neighbourhood making led by administrative bodies. This result indicated that the long-term strategics for space renewal and community revitalization were important. Various easy ways of residents’ participation to reflect their interests and operation systems were also needed. Finally, current local issues, active residents’ participation and residents’ opinions would be included in the process of neighbour making in the future.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/YU.REPOSITORY/29651http://dx.doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2013.19.2.129
ISSN
1225-8857
Appears in Collections:
자연자원대학 > 산림자원및조경학과 > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE