Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author염미경ko
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-17T00:40:26Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-17T00:40:26Z-
dc.date.created2015-11-30-
dc.date.issued201008-
dc.identifier.citation상사법연구, v.29, no.2, pp.175 - 202-
dc.identifier.issn1226-3362-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/YU.REPOSITORY/23748-
dc.description.abstractThe purport of the Korean Commercial Code article 39 is to protect a third person who believe the registration in good faith which is different from the truth. There are some problems on making an application of Korean Commercial Code article 39 when the resolution of the shareholder's meeting is rescinded by judgment or declared non-existence by a court. When a court decides to rescind the resolution of the shareholder's meeting on election of directors, the directors loose their status retroactively and the registration on the election of chief executive officer based on the rescinded resolution also becomes different from the truth. But a third person who believes the registration in good faith could be protected by Korean Commercial Code article 39 and the corporation could not assert that the registration on the election of the chief executive officer is invalid. In this case there is a expressed intention of corporation to elect directors although the resolution becomes invalid retroactively by judgment and the corporations itself is responsible for the registration which is base on the rescinded resolution On the contrary when there is a declaratory judgment on non-existence of the resolution of the shareholder’s meeting on election of directors based on the fake minutes, there is no expressed intention of corporation to elect directors even though the resolution is forged by a controling shareholder who has 50% of shares. Thereafter the corporations could insist that the registration on the election of the chief executive officer base on the non-existed resolution is invalid. The Supreme Court has the same opinion on this matter. But the Supreme Court did not explain why the corporation was responsible for the registration which was different from the truth when the resolution of the shareholder’s meeting on election of directors was rescinded by the court. The more concrete explanation by the Supreme Court would be expected on this case.-
dc.language한국어-
dc.publisher한국상사법학회-
dc.subject부실등기-
dc.subject주주총회결의취소-
dc.subject주주총회결의부존재-
dc.subject선의의 제3자-
dc.subjectregistration by filing of false facts-
dc.subjectnon-existence of a resolution of the shareholder's meeting on election of directors-
dc.subjecta rescinded resolution of the shareholder’s meeting on election of directors-
dc.subjecta third person acting in good faith-
dc.title부실등기의 성립요건 -이사를 선임한 주주총회결의의 하자를 중심으로 --
dc.title.alternativeSeveral Issues on Registrations by Filing of False Facts-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART001478830-
Appears in Collections:
법학전문대학원 > 법학전문대학원 > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE